Re: RFC: fix summary text for lots of packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "JB" == Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

JB> So, while I think packaging guidelines are good to have, I don't
JB> think everything needs to be codified there.

Actually I have tried to get docs folks involved in working up some
reasonable tips and pointers for package summaries and descriptions.
So far, i haven't found interest.

I always check summaries and descriptions as part of my package
reviews, but I know that not everyone is a native speaker of English
and I wouldn't want to exclude them from the review process, so
perhaps some periodic review of these things would be useful.

 - J<

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux