On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 13:37 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote: > mod_nss and mod_ssl can co-exist ok. The problem is when you also want > to use mod_proxy. mod_proxy doesn't have a generic way to register SSL > callbacks. It has a single API. Both mod_ssl and mod_nss can register > those callbacks but mod_nss will defer to mod_ssl if it is already > loaded. Is there any advantage in mod_proxy using mod_ssl versus mod_nss? -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx> PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
