Re: RFC: fix summary text for lots of packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 09:56:28AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>Josh Boyer (jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx) said: 
>> >It would also be a good idea to have a few "shining examples" for people
>> >to copy when creating new packages. When we've done that, I'll start
>> >filing bugs.
>> 
>> Just file bugs for packages you think are overly verbose.  Offer
>> alternate summaries in the bug, and a URL to your email for
>> rationale.
>
>I'm not sure this scales across 5000 packages. So it would be good
>to have at least *something* in the guidelines.

You're assuming that all 5000 packages need fixing.  I doubt that's
the case.

Also, the bugs need to be filed either way.  So the scaling argument
still applies and adding a guideline for this is really just unneeded
work...

josh

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux