Re: RFC: fix summary text for lots of packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu November 20 2008, Richard Hughes wrote:

> "A simple GNOME application that converts media files to Free formats"
>
> First, we don't need to say it's an application, not that it's GNOME
> specific. Surely something like this would be better:

If I understand you correctly, you say that the summary should not mention, 
that it is GNOME specific, but in the bug report you write that this is a 
good summary:

| GNOME Power Manager

Imho it is not bad to mention that an applications is GNOME / KDE / whatever 
specific unless it is obvious from the package name. Also iirc the package 
for the GNOME power manager is also named gnome-power-manager, so imho above 
summary does not contain any additional useful information imho.

Regards,
Till

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux