On 2008-11-19, 21:23 GMT, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > I think you misundestood something. If order to effectively > hunt issues, we definitely need HUGE number of bugreports > (remember Necrosoft's "Send crash dump" utility). That > definitely means one-way communication. I'm insisting - one-way > communication (e.g. user will send bugreport to > invisible-to-him blackhole, w/o answer, with some handy tool). Pardon me for interrupting here, but in my humble opinion the previous paragraph is the very good example of the thing which we should avoid by any means legally permissible. Such tool might be useful for crashes (because there it is highly probable that victim of crash files a bug and then you have choice between poorly filed bug or well filed one (and even there I would question the utility of such thing -- ask Gnome and Mozilla folks about their experience). However, most bugs are not crashes (or at least in the world of Xorg and gecko where I spent my working hours) and there the communication with reporter is absolutely essential. > Mediawiki will be easier to enduser in case of reporting bugs. Why? If the reporters are not able to complete prefiled form, why do you think they would be doing any better to compose the text themselves? Matěj -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
