Re: F11: things to check in a release tree before a release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, Chris Adams wrote:

Once upon a time, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> said:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:29:37 -0500 (EST), Seth Vidal wrote:
â?¢ SONAME-provides conflicts

explain more about what we check for here?
Is this like multiple things providing libfoo.so() and one of them being a
bogon autodep?

Exactly. :)

I'd suggest expanding that to check perl (and other language) module
provides as well.

For example, for a while MRTG included a private copy of the RRD perl
modules, and "mrtg" was shorter than "rrdtool-perl", so anything using
the RRD modules would auto-dep pull in MRTG (which didn't solve the
dep).

so in general we need to produce lists of all multiple providers of any single provide. Then they can be verified manually?

-sv
-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux