On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Jon Masters <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I disagree. Various other communities (and distributions) have made a > point out of "stable" releases where the "big ticket" feature is > stabilization, so I think it would be a win to consider that. It's > harder to recommend Fedora to friends when they see stuff break. I'm not hearing any concrete action items on how you think we could do better inside of our process. I gave you a hint as to where you could be focusing your effort to drive improvment. -jef"really wants to drill down into the unspoken assumption that underlines the line of reasoning expressed here. Just because someone says they make stability a high priority does not mean they are doing better at it. But that is for another time, after I've had a chance to deep dive into bug data from which rationale conclusions can be drawn."spaleta -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
