Re: PackageMaintainers/Policy pages and FESCo responsibilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: PackageMaintainers/Policy pages and FESCo responsibilities
From: Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:22:34 +0100
In-reply-to: <20081116172041.GE2933@xxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx>, fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 06:20:41PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> Hello,

The subject should have been 
PackageMaintainers/Policy pages and FESCo responsibilities

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- PackageMaintainers/Policy/EOL pages and FESCo responsibilities
  - From: Patrice Dumas

Prev by Date: PackageMaintainers/Policy/EOL pages and FESCo responsibilities
Next by Date: Re: tzdata in FC10 is older than the one in FC9
Previous by thread: PackageMaintainers/Policy/EOL pages and FESCo responsibilities
Next by thread: Re: PackageMaintainers/Policy/EOL pages and FESCo responsibilities
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux