Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > Actually, the problem is pretty clear: you simply cannot do what > you're trying to do. > > If your package won't even build on PPC, it simply can't be noarch. > The ExcludeArch: case for noarch packages is for those with runtime > dependencies that aren't available for all architectures. That's not > the case you're seeing. > > Your options are either to wait until the JRE bug is fixed or make > your package arch-specific. no it's not that easy. the question is: what the noarch means? - it should have to be run on any arch? or - it should have to be run _AND_ build on any arch? this package is a pure java package which is noarch the the result gstreamer-java-1.0-1.fc10.noarch.rpm can be run on any arch, BUT as there is a bug in #468831 in java-1.6.0-openjdk on ppc it can't be compiled on ppc. so if eg. there is a bug in python compiler or in the python interpreter on ppc then the python packages no longer noarch packages? -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
