Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 01:14:02PM -0800, John Poelstra wrote: >> Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Windows_cross_compiler >> The page appears to be only partially complete and in Category: >> FeaturePageIncomplete > > Yes because, erm, it's not complete. > I think poelcat means, it's incomplete so won't be discussed yet :-) > Partly I have no idea what's supposed to go in the Test Plan section. > An actual test plan covering the features of all the libraries would > be huge and take weeks to run. In addition, we have to disable %check > sections in MinGW packages because wine cannot run inside the mock/ > koji environment. Wine needs an X server and a writable $HOME. > The test plan needs to tell people how to tell if the Feature is complete and whether it's reasonable to tell people it's ready to use when the next Fedora release comes out. If the feature passes the test plan then the Feature is announced. If it fails the test plan, then whatever is in the Contingency Plan would go into effect. For MinGW, I'd ask, how do you know that the libraries you produce are working? What basic goals should someone be able to achieve when using them? What tasks can a tester do to show that someone wanting to utilize the feature is not going to be frustrated and disappointed? -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
