Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
You can volunteer to maintain it.
I proposed to for a packager in FAS but I'm still waiting for the acceptance
The RPM philosophy is that installation and configuration should be separate activities. There
good policy
yes but the rpm already ships with a config file
rpm -qf /etc/samba/smb.conf
samba-common-3.2.4-0.22.fc10.i386
Yes, and the configuration file is owned by *one* package. When multiple
packages try to own the same file, very bad things happen, as evidenced by this
incident:
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/18/1210257
so I ask for that file in that package to be modified to have a line like this
usershare path = /var/lib/samba/usershare
BTW: I forget that we have system-config-samba
we can put a checkbox [ ] enable nautilus-share
That's exactly how we should do it.
-- Chris
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
