On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 23:39:50 -0500 "Bruce A. Locke" <blocke@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 19:39, Vincent wrote: > > > I thought Fedora wasn't vulnerable to that bug due to exec-shield. Packard never > > saw that one comming! > > This comment makes me curious. Has anyone been testing the recent user > space vulnerabilities and seeing if exec-shield + prelink randomization > prevented at least some of them from being exploited? > > Just curious... > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Bruce A. Locke > blocke@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list Yes _some_ have been tested behind the scenes but the results aren't public yet from what I gather. All I've heard is that X wasn't vuln.
Attachment:
pgpzvPqjnEaQu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
