On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 19:20, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Macros in URLs simply don't work. If you want macros in Source tags, > cut off everything up to the file name like > I'm not sure I understand your first statement. Everything else you say makes sense. I'm just not making the last simple leap into enlightenment here. I guess I don't understand in what sense you mean "don't work". Sure your example Source: <URL> was ugly but is that the extent of the complaint or is there something further? > > Also note that only the expanded file name will appear in the RPM header, > not the URL prefix. Some simple testing shows that this is true whether or not macros are used in the Source: line. So your point is that using a URL in a Source line is purely for the benefit of the QA'er/packager anyhow? -Toshio -- Toshio <toshio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
