On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 15:10, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:13:20 -0700, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > Here is a Spec file template with everything that should be defined in a > > way that is easily parsable by an automated > > service/QA_monkey_who_will_fling_dung_at_non_compliant_specfiles > > > > For things outside of this spec file, this is the order that we would > > like things to be in. > > > > Here are some good examples of SPEC files that you can use as reference > > when starting with something new. > > > > Here are things to avoid/not do because they make QA/maintainers lives > > heck and more likely that they will throw dung at you. > > This is going too far, IMHO, because it comes close to the opposite of > "common sense". ;) > Well I doubt that HIPAA or ISO9xxx (or other govt documentation processes) are long on common sense.. I have to come up with a set of methods for doing this to make sure that developers have a clear documented process... that they can then ignore :P -- Stephen John Smoogen smoogen@xxxxxxxx Los Alamos National Lab CCN-5 Sched 5/40 PH: 4-0645 Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S Los Alamos, NM 87545 -- So shines a good deed in a weary world. = Willy Wonka --
