On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 19:45:17 +0100 (CET), Dag Wieers wrote: > > > 3] I don't rely on QA people as I'd rather automate and assume a > > QA person has better things to do. > > Packagers should not "rely on" QA. But often a second pair of eyes > helps. I didn't say a QA person wouldn't be useful, did I ? Rather that we do things in such a way that it prevents extra QA, if it fails it fails with the packager and not a couple of hours/days later when it gets QA'd. I don't like switching context. > Let me add my bit of QA: please fix your rpm2html package. > You don't know what's wrong? Then get inspiration here: I don't know what's wrong except that I have an older version and missing BuildRequires (which I don't think matters that much). The new version builds without any modification to the spec and I really don't see what QA has to do with it. If there's something I missed I'm sure you would tell me. So thanks for letting me know there's a newer version. I should really script something that helps me find newer versions automatically. PS You don't need the CFLAGS="-O2" (anymore?), the %makeinstall macro works too and I would %config(noreplace) the config-file. Kind regards, -- dag wieers, dag@xxxxxxxxxx, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
