On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 17:59, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > > Shrug, he's not alone in that. I was against *mandating* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > > It's not mandatory. It just happens to be in the specfile templates as > well as recommended in the QA checklist because of its "official" status > according to jbj's comments. Well, it used to be mandatory and all the QA checklist still require it. It can't be more mandatory than that imo. I guess someone has to remove it from the Wiki then ;) -- dag wieers, dag@xxxxxxxxxx, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
