vim in fc1 vs fc2
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
:
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject
: vim in fc1 vs fc2
From
: seth vidal <
skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 23:56:28 -0400
List-archive
: </archives/fedora-devel-list>
List-help
: <
mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help
>
List-id
: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list.redhat.com>
List-post
: <
mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
>
List-subscribe
: <
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>, <
mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe
>
List-unsubscribe
: <
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>, <
mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
>
Reply-to
: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>
Oddity. vim-* in fc1+updates is newer than fc2+updates Is that intentional? -sv
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Follow-Ups
:
Re: vim in fc1 vs fc2
From:
Ralf Corsepius
Prev by Date:
Re: my system needs manual network ifup after boot
Next by Date:
Re: vim in fc1 vs fc2
Previous by thread:
[Fwd: Memtest86+ V1.25 Released]
Next by thread:
Re: vim in fc1 vs fc2
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Fedora Announce]
[Fedora Kernel]
[Fedora Testing]
[Fedora Formulas]
[Fedora PHP Devel]
[Kernel Development]
[Fedora Legacy]
[Fedora Maintainers]
[Fedora Desktop]
[PAM]
[Red Hat Development]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
