Re: zeroconf and security

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 15:23 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> Colin Walters wrote:
> > Sure.  You can also answer DNS requests faster than the company DNS
> > server.  There's nothing new here, these protocols are insecure. Barring
> > widespread use of DNSSEC, security has to come at a higher level via
> > IPSec, TLS, etc.
> 
> DNS or DHCP?

Both.  They both have the exact same potential problems.  Actually,
*any* protocol has this problem, unless it has some sort of
authentication method.  I can easily put up a web server on the local
net that answers for the same IP as the corporate web server.  If the
connection isn't encrypted or the clients ignore certificate warnings, I
can attack your network with very little effort once I'm inside.

> 
> 
-- 
Sean Middleditch <elanthis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
AwesomePlay Productions, Inc.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux