On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 12:04:44PM -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > I'd really really like it if someone inside the fence line could find > (or be allocated) the time to sit down and think through DKMS and see > if it makes sense to provide DKMS in core, as the preferred solution Actually thats already happening. > to some of the add-on kernel-module problems. I don't know if if DKMS > can solve all of the add-on module issues, I'm no expert, but I'd have > to agree that right now DKMS looks like a best path forward to me. DKMS doesn't seem to solve a lot of problems that packaging the stuff up in rpms nicely does. It provides a way to rebuild modules nicely and it looks like a good tool for administering that bit. I'm not sure it needs to be in core for Fedora since add on drivers can requires: dkms it if appropriate but I'd like to hear views on the Fedora side.
