On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 03:55:46PM -0700, Jamie Zawinski wrote: > Not that I could tell. But anyway, that would only show the breakdown > within the X process, which was only around 150MB. > > The really weird part here is that the memory usage reported by top does > not add up to 1GB. I'd expect that. X for example has virtual mappings for the video RAM so can easily be 128Mb of resident pages that are not actually main memory. Direct render clients can do likewise.
