On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 14:37 +0100, Joe Orton wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 02:31:21PM +0100, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote: > > On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 07:40 -0400, Build System wrote: > > > hal-0.2.97-2 > > > ------------ > > > * Wed Aug 18 2004 John (J5) Palmieri <johnp@xxxxxxxxxx> 0.2.97-2 > > > > > > - Add stopgap patch to remove suid from mount flags (RH Bug #130290) > > > > You are not authorized to access bug #130290. > > > > Bad karma #1: seems like a bad bug > > Bad karma #2: WTF? Are you hiding bugs? > > The bug was filed with the "Security Sensitive" flag set by the > reporter, so is kept confidential by default - I've asked whether it's > OK to clear this since the fix is public now anyway. Oh, I see. But this policy is not so good, IMHO. I hope it is cleared :) OT: personally I'm in favour of full disclosure, and I won't reply to anyone trying to make a thread on this, so don't bother to criticize! Thanks, Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
