-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 17 August 2004 06:33, Stephen J Smoogen wrote: > No but it does make bootstrapping and starting an auditing process > easier. And while it may be more of a RHEL type item.. there may be a > need for an 'OpenFedora' style sub-project to help kickstart it for > organizations that need to have all source code internally verified > before being put into production. These projects usually have to build > up to the entire distro, and un-needed buildrequires cause issues with > that being possible. [There are likely groups that are only 1/2 of the > way through RHEL-3 having to do it with every RPM.] Or a more practical example would be the porting of Fedora to other archs such as PPC and Alpha and whatever else. - -- Jesse Keating RHCE (http://geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (http://www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBIhx84v2HLvE71NURAqPAAJwMPNjhIWxEQqeh8l/B6UaBQscrDQCglCS+ 7gEgxs4hJbx72PtKXxjokIM= =Dixk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
