The registries maintaining the reverse DNS systems at least APNIC and RIPE NCC, have been discussing removing delegations for ip6.int by the 9th of September. http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-ipv6/archive/2004/07/msg00001.html "I propose that RIPE, and actually any other RIR, stops any delegations for ip6.int per 9/9/2006. Which is more than 3 years after the RFC has been released. ..." Paul On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 02:26, Pekka Savola wrote: > On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Daniel Roesen wrote: > > Ideally, glibc should do: > > > > - nibble format in ip6.arpa > > if that doesn't succeed: > > - nibble format in ip6.int > > Or even just forgo ip6.int altogether. If ip6.int doesn't work > properly (causing delays), and isn't needed anymore, we shouldn't even > bother trying it. > > But I don't have strong objections either way, as long as ip6.arpa is > tried first. > > -- > Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the > Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." > Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
