Christopher Aillon wrote:
The people who use gthumb will voice opinion contrary to what you just presented. So since we're echoing others, "you can't please everyone." What I personally would rather see is the gthumb and gqview and eog people get together and figure out what to do with the image viewer mess.
I second this approach. A hybridized image vewing application the leverages the robust feature set of all three and shares the agility of the best of breed would be most welcome by this user. Each image viewer does *something* better than the others. How much work would it take to form a little cooperative and glue some ideas together?
--mf
