Re: LVM snapshot

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 05:05 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Aug 11, 2004, Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Did I do something wrong or is this an indication of a kernel bug in LVM?

It is a bug.  LVM support in the FC2 kernels has been very poor,
except for the trivial stuff like creating LVs and using them.
Snapshots and pvmove were the most important features I've missed in
the device-mapper-based implementation of LVM.
So it wasn't my bad when pvmove didn't work!
Răzvan Corneliu VILT                      e-mail:razvan.vilt@xxxxxxxxxxx
GPG:http://d3vi1.linux360.ro/public-keys/ www: http://d3vi1.linux360.ro/

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux