Re: Suggestion for an altered portmap package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 04:46, W. Michael Petullo wrote:
> > portmap has been useless on 95% on the servers I've installed, since those
> > servers didn't use NFS, NIS, etc. So removing portmap is one of the rutine
> > post-installation tasks for me; I bet I'm not the only one. Hence, I
> > suggest that portmap _not_ be part of a "minimal install" installation.
> > 
> > Anyways:
> > On desktop systems, I can't get rid of portmap because fam needs it.
> 
> It does not seem that gamin, fam's replacement, requires portmap.
> Is this true?

Yes. Gamin is a per-user process. So, not only does it not use portmap,
it also works with selinux.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Alexander Larsson                                            Red Hat, Inc 
                   alexl@xxxxxxxxxx    alla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
He's a short-sighted voodoo cop searching for his wife's true killer. She's a 
cold-hearted Bolivian politician who dreams of becoming Elvis. They fight 
crime! 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux