Re: Using updates-testing was [Re: Device change for Sil 3112 in latest kernel]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 01:18:51PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 01:17:55PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 01:03:59PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > > That would be great - now I'm forced to use kernel from 
> > > > http://atrpms.net/dist/fc2/kernel-experimental/ due to the KDSKBENT bug 
> > > 
> > > I wonder what the fix is atrpms applied....
> > 
> > The only thing that qualifies as a "fix" are the 8kstacks. The rest is
> > v4l2 and uml, don't believe there will be fixes coming from that
> > corner ...
> 
> kdskbent isn't a 8k-vs-4k thing though...
> maybe just a newer version than the last one the reporter tried and it got
> fixed since or something

ATrpms bases its kernel on the FC kernels and takes over the
nomenclature adding a subrelease tag with an underscore like
2.6.7-1.499_7.rhfc2.at (so that would be based off 2.6.7-1.499).

Dawid, please post the uname -r of your kernel, the matching rawhide
kernel should then have the fix.

BTW I have withdrawn the 499-503 kernels from
http://atrpms.net/dist/fc2/kernel-experimental/ as there were issues
with smp on HT systems. 509 seems to work fine though.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpXKJvgOaDmI.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux