On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 11:07:51AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > Silke Reimer wrote: > >Hallo list again, > > > >I just did my self-introduction and immediately I have my first > >questions: > > > >1. > >If I want to announce and provide the packages which I produced, is > >it necessary to set up a special directory tree on my server > >(something like fedora/2/i386/RPMS.unstable etc.) where the packages > >are made available for download? > > > >2. > >I am not sure about the right Fedora tree for my packages. Most of > >them are stable in my opinion and could placed in testing but since > >these are my first Fedora packages I am thinking about to place them > >in unstable for the start. What do you think? > > > >3. > >I don't know which official group I should use. For the libraries > >this is rather easy. But I don't what to do with GIS software > >(perhaps Applications/Productivity). It is even more difficult with > >geodata. They don't seem to fit to any group of RH (s. > >http://www.fedora.us/wiki/RPMGroups). Any idea? > > > >Ciao, > > > > Silke > > > > > > > Check out the QA and Submission policy link at www.fedora.us: > http://www.fedora.us/wiki/PackageSubmissionQAPolicy OK. This does help for point 1. Sorry for asking this stupid question. But I still don't know what to do with 2. and 3. Of course I could let this open for the QA-people but I think it does make sense to fill in the right values from the very beginning. Thanks, Silke -- Silke Reimer Intevation GmbH http://intevation.de/ FreeGIS http://freegis.org/
Attachment:
pgphRYd66edI5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
