On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 22:29, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Saturday 31 July 2004 11:29, Lamar Owen wrote: > > So I install the linux-atm userland, and attempt to use the HE. Well, the > > .358 kernel doesn't have the HE or any ATM drivers. So I updated to the > > latest, and it has CONFIG_ATM unset, too. My question to the kernel > > maintainers here (Arjan, Alan, and Dave) is simply 'Why no ATM?' The ATM > > support is actively maintained, is production quality, etc. > > Arjan, I've not seen a comment from you on this. Can you please comment, even > if the comment is for me to just go away with my ATM junk? :-) ATM is of, ehm, mixed quality. Some parts are ok, some are undermaintained it seems and might pose a security risk. Note that the current erratum kernel has ATM at least partially turned on but I would appreciate feedback on which hardware works to be able to make a more informed decision about what to enable exactly... "it compiles" vs "it gives scary warnings" isn't the bes ;)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
