Re: PROPOSAL: Core size reduction "bug day"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Aug  2, 2004, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 17:50, Alan Cox wrote:

>> I cerainly don't. Extras also needs to be bounded by being open source and
>> not dependant on proprietary code

> Why? Would you mind to elaborate your motivation for this position?

> I agree, it is in Linux/GNU's general interest to  promote "Open Source"
> SW, but I also feel this isn't necessarily attractive to many users.

> I.e. in case Extras is supposed to contain "OpenSource" only (Which I am
> not opposed to!), I vote for adding a "Non-OpenSource" add-on repository
> to Fedora Extras.

The Fedora project is about creating a full operating system out of
FOSS only.  Fedora Extras, being part of the Fedora project, shouldn't
go against this goal.  If you want to create repositories with Extras
for Fedora, nobody is going to stop you, but it can't be Fedora
Extras.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva             http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux