Re: Automake 1.9 breakage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 12:40:34AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> A package should *always* call a specific version of automake.  If a
> package directly invokes "automake", that's a bug.  It should instead
> call automake-1.8, automake-1.4, whatever is known to work.

Most don't bother. Nor can you really blame the package authors since
most of them wrote their configuration stuff without realising a bunch
of nutters would start issuing a zillion differently incompatible autoconf
tool sets with more new syntax bugs than perl

> The automake binaries are versioned for a reason - so installing a new
> version doesn't break builds.  Patches to move to a new version should
> be upstream, since they are more likely to be familiar with their build
> system and the effects of new automake versions on their packages.

So you want to end up in the state where CD #2 is "autoconfs"  8) ?



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux