On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 13:31, Peter Backlund wrote: > Jesse Keating wrote: > > >On Tuesday 27 April 2004 23:34, Peter Backlund wrote: > > > > > >>Given that FC2 is scheduled to be released on May 17, would it be > >>possible to extend the errata lifetime for RH9 by one month, making > >>EOL happen on May 31 instead of April 30? That would allow for a > >>smooth upgrade from RH9 to FC2, with a few days to the mirrors to > >>catch up, some margin for delays and even time for the most common > >>quirks to hit the faqs. > >> > >> > > > >http://www.fedoralegacy.org > > > Yes, I am aware of Fedora Legacy. The point was that, however, that > since the dates of RH9 EOL and FC2 release are not very far apart, it > would be fairly easy to allow RH9 users to go directly to FC2, without > having to go via Fedora Legacy or run FC1 for two weeks. Smoother > transition. > I doubt anyone would want to run FC2 right after it comes out in a production environment.. that would mean they should then extend support another 6 months or so. I doubt that would happen, so I would say that if you are looking to transition goto FC1 and then figure out when you are ready to go to FC2. > /Peter Backlund -- Stephen John Smoogen smoogen@xxxxxxxx Los Alamos National Lab CCN-5 Sched 5/40 PH: 4-0645 Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S Los Alamos, NM 87545 -- You should consider any operational computer to be a security problem --
