On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 15:17, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 05:53:20PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > (Just an example, by the way; not necessarily a whine about that particular > > bug, which was apparently fixed in a later X update.) > > If I *were* to complain about a specific bug desperately in need of some > communication from Red Hat, it'd be this one: > > <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55193> > > Filed in 2001, and there's more than two dozen comments, none by anyone from > Red Hat. The state is still "new". And there's a bunch of duplicates. And > several suggested fixes. And it's a critically vital horrible problem that > affects everything from ancient RHL to RHEL to FC. Here, Here! I was about to post essentially the same thing. Especially considering that at least one of the duplicates and a number of comments were added by me. The fact that this bug has persisted so long is embarrassing. Yes, it's easy to work around as long as you remember to never run authconfig again, but seeing as that's the "supported" method for changing pam/nss configuration, having to remember to make this one line change every time seems a little broken. -- Shahms King <shahms@xxxxxxxxxx>
