On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 00:57, seth vidal wrote: > On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 23:54 -0700, Paul Rigor wrote: > > > Red Hat's name is still on the line if its side projects mess up... hence > > the control? > > > > red hat's name is on the line if they fail to interact with people in > the community in positive ways. > > And which one do you think is more detrimental headline? > 1. open software vendor includes bugs in free software product > or > 2. open source software vendor fails to communicate or interact > favorably with open source developers outside of own company. > Hmmm Red Hat is f*k'd either way. Maybe it should just get out of the business of Open Source.. it seems like too much work to be useful. > -sv > -- Stephen John Smoogen smoogen@xxxxxxxx Los Alamos National Lab CCN-5 Sched 5/40 PH: 4-0645 Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S Los Alamos, NM 87545 -- You should consider any operational computer to be a security problem --
