On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> If you cannot do that, well, that's tough. > >Well, it _is_ tough, but I'm surprised that we're the only place that seems >to have real interest. > > >> To stick to RHEL 3 and OpenAFS would probably your best bet. > >Does RHEL plan to stick with the 2.4 kernel forever? > I figure RHEL-2/3 will always be 2.4.x. RHEL-4 is probably going to be 2.6.x... that probably tells you where AFS support will be in it. -- Stephen John Smoogen smoogen@xxxxxxxx Los Alamos National Lab CCN-5 Sched 5/40 PH: 4-0645 Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S Los Alamos, NM 87545 -- You should consider any operational computer to be a security problem --
