On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 01:08:14PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote: > An argument against individual i18n files is that if you have an errata > for OpenOffice.org, the you have to do the QA process and errata _every_ > single one of the i18n packages too, which is more administrative > overhead. Why push an errata for dictionaries? Assuming the file format does not change and the upgrade doesn't change dictionary.lst, AFAICS they can happily stay in /usr/lib/openoffice/share/dict/ooo (although I admit I haven't looked at hyphenation and thesaurus). This might be more difficult for grammar checkers, though. > Also, I hear that the KDE i18n stuff is special-cased inside of > Anaconda, the same would have to be done for OOo if that is true (jeremy > is at lunch right now). A quick grep does not confirm that. Mirek
