Russell Coker wrote:
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 05:43, Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In the long run apt should probably run in it's own domain with suitable
restrictions on the methods etc... but this all raises the question:
How are 3rd party packages supposed to ship their own policy settings in
a sane manner?
I've added rpm_exec_t entries for the apt programs in my tree.
If we are going to have apt as a recommended program or if we have some setup
with yum or up2date whereby one program gets the files and another does the
install (similar to the apt-get/dpkg) then we could write policy to
support/enforce that distinction.
However I expect apt to be phased out, so it's probably not worth doing.
apt will not be phased out.
Warren
