kernel RPM: Why is CONFIG_IEEE1394 unset?
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>
Subject
: kernel RPM: Why is CONFIG_IEEE1394 unset?
From
: Martin Stone <
martin.stone@xxxxxx
>
Date
: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 10:29:01 -0400
List-archive
: </archives/fedora-devel-list>
List-help
: <
mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help
>
List-id
: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list.redhat.com>
List-post
: <
mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
>
List-subscribe
: <
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>, <
mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe
>
List-unsubscribe
: <
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>, <
mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
>
Reply-to
: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>
User-agent
: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20031030
Hi all,
Just wondering, in the supplied *i?86*.config files for the kernel src RPM, why is CONFIG_IEEE1394 unset?
Also wondering why 4KSTACKS is turned on?
Thanks, Martin
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Follow-Ups
:
Re: kernel RPM: Why is CONFIG_IEEE1394 unset?
From:
Arjan van de Ven
Prev by Date:
Re: Forward looking to FC2 final and SELinux
Next by Date:
Re: Forward looking to FC2 final and SELinux
Previous by thread:
RFE (fedora 3? 2.1?)
Next by thread:
Re: kernel RPM: Why is CONFIG_IEEE1394 unset?
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Fedora Announce]
[Fedora Kernel]
[Fedora Testing]
[Fedora Formulas]
[Fedora PHP Devel]
[Kernel Development]
[Fedora Legacy]
[Fedora Maintainers]
[Fedora Desktop]
[PAM]
[Red Hat Development]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]