ReiserFS(v3,v4) vs. Ext3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Development discussions related to Fedora Core" <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: ReiserFS(v3,v4) vs. Ext3
From: "Paul Rigor" <pryce@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 17:13:49 -0700
List-archive: </archives/fedora-devel-list>
List-help: <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-id: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1080687441.10735.55.camel@opus><1080688557.1212.3.camel@shahms.mesd.k12.or.us><1080738195.869.0.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com><1080796713.7795.0.camel@roadrash.rdu.redhat.com><1080800347.21566.24.camel@skyfox.terraplex.com><20040401074546.5766.qmail@mail.avlug.org><024201c41b6d$a1c08330$42518e95@dhgpine> <024701c41b71$fa4aff90$42518e95@dhgpine>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hi,

Are there plans to include other filesystems during anaconda?  How about
including reiserfs?  I've had to manually create this filesystem... it's
plug-and-chug, but tedious.

Thanks,
Paul Rigor
pryce@xxxxxxxx
Go Bruins! Go FC!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ReiserFS(v3,v4) vs. Ext3
  - From: Jeremy Katz
- Re: ReiserFS(v3,v4) vs. Ext3
  - From: Michael A. Peters

References:
- Future: fhs 2.3 compliance for fc3
  - From: seth vidal
- Re: Future: fhs 2.3 compliance for fc3
  - From: Shahms King
- Re: Future: fhs 2.3 compliance for fc3
  - From: Felipe Alfaro Solana
- Re: Future: fhs 2.3 compliance for fc3
  - From: Chris Kloiber
- Re: Future: fhs 2.3 compliance for fc3
  - From: Dan Burcaw
- Re: Future: fhs 2.3 compliance for fc3
  - From: Aaron Matteson
- Fedora test 2: SELinux is problematic
  - From: Paul Rigor
- Re: Fedora test 2: SELinux is problematic
  - From: Paul Rigor

Prev by Date: Xfree86 v. X11-X.org
Next by Date: Re: FC2T2 boot floppies
Previous by thread: Re: Xfree86 v. X11-X.org
Next by thread: Re: ReiserFS(v3,v4) vs. Ext3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]