On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 20:20, Jesse Keating wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tuesday 06 April 2004 18:50, Alan Cox wrote: > > Because if the default loose rules are right then normal users simply > > wont be aware of SELinux expect as something that appears in security > > errata notes as "SELinux users are not affected" > > How do these loose rules effect the plethora of 3rd party software out > there? What about things like webmin which come in through it's own > webserver and touch practicaly everything on the system? What about > webmail programs. Hell, what about KDE? KDE still isn't right is it? I > seriously doubt these lofty goals will all be fixed perfectly by May. > > Sure, SELinux might be made perfect for a pure FC2 system, but when was the > last time you ran across a joe home user that was using a 100% pure Red > Hat Linux system? > Jesse, you need to look at this as a business oppurtunity for your VAR. You now can charge big bucks to add selinux=0 in grub.conf for the 'meatheads' who cant do it themselves ;) -- Stephen John Smoogen smoogen@xxxxxxxx Los Alamos National Lab CCN-5 Sched 5/40 PH: 4-0645 Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S Los Alamos, NM 87545 -- You should consider any operational computer to be a security problem --
