On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 18:08 +0300, Doncho N. Gunchev wrote: > > The advantage of having this in a single directory is, for instance, > > sharing. > You can not share binaries from diferent distributions or even > diferent distribution versions sometimes. Right. I must've lost or skimmed too much some email. > That is the idea of having ~/.younameit/arch/distro-ver/bin. If you check > > BUT STAY AWAY FROM STUPID VISIBLE DIRECTORIES IN ~/ (oh > > well, maybe in this case one can tolerate a visible ~/YouNameIt since > > not only you're not forced to use it, but also there might be an > > interest in using it, just don't add a few couple of hundreds of > > uselless directories in the desktop. > I prefer many visible configuration files in configurable base > directory instead of many hidden configuration files in my home > directory. They are visible, just very seldom used or touched, and they fill with useless clutter desktops in ~/ which is much more user friendly than brain-dead-Windows-alike ~/Desktop/ . We don't need this folder, we _are_using_ an operating system designed for multi-user perspective, but that is a discussion for another list/thread. Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
