Le sam, 03/04/2004 Ã 06:29 -0500, Toshio a Ãcrit : > On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 18:15, Erik LaBianca wrote: > > XML Output is a great idea IMO. We can define a schema for a review, and > > then use xslt to generate the actual review. We should all be able to > > easily agree on the xml schema, and for those that love to tweak they > > can always change the output template. > > > > In all reality, there may be a certain amount of benefit to actually > > posting the review in XML. It's obviously the easiest way of making the > > reviews computer parseable. > > > If we get to the point of having tools within which you can write a > complete review, we could have the tools post an xml review as an > attachment and a human formatted review as the attachment's comments. Just make the review the xml file and provide an xslt stylesheet which converts it to something pretty. Cheers, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
