On Sat, 2004-04-03 at 00:07, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hi Colon, Colin, thanks :) > > This is what the Fedora Docs Project is all about - they have a mailing > > list too: fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > And no, they are creating docs from scratch rather than using the > > current RHL guides. Further discussion about this should be done at the > > above mailing list > > Ok. Yet another mailing list. But could you explain the rationale behind > that decision here? The devel list seems an appropriate place to at > least hold a summary of such decisions in it's archive. With all these > lists and channels information is fragmented enough as it is. Erm, its not my decision to create a separate docs project - the docs project's task is clearly stated at: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/ Its just like we don't do translations on f-d-l, as there's fedora-trans-list > I can't find such extensive docs for Fedora yet (howto != guide), so why > not maintain them until alternatives are available? That's because they're mostly in creation, and aren't ready yet for prime time. Why not use existing RH9 documents? Karsten has a really good answer (look at 3&4 together): https://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/2003-December/msg00065.html -- Colin Charles, byte@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.bytebot.net/
