On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 01:58:57PM +0200, Dennis Bjorklund wrote: > Is there a reason why gphoto2 and libgphoto2 are in the same package > and not two seperate ones? I'd like a separate libgphoto2 > package. The library is used by more frontends then just gphoto2. What's the advantage of separating the (tiny) gphoto2 binary out? Tim. */
Attachment:
pgpSUh7v7HwpV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
