On Fr, 28.01.22 12:25, Florian Weimer (fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > >> One issue is that it's harder to prevent other users from doing execve > >> than it's denying them access to some IPC service. In this sense, SUID > >> programs are more robust. > > > > Well, that's precisely the problem that PK was supposed to address, > > but then it descended down the JS rabbit hole... > > Not sure if we are talking about the same thing. I meant flooding the > local socket (or similar) with requests, not access control. Well, making socket services scalable is not entirely trivial, but i figure the number of parallel connections a Linux system should be able to handle is still higher than the number of processes it allows to run in parallel... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
