Fwd: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210916.n.0 changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]





---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Luna Jernberg <droidbittin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 2:30 PM
Subject: Fwd: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210916.n.0 changes
To: Martin Jernberg <droidbittin@xxxxxxxxx>, Luna Jernberg <bittin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>




---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Luna Jernberg <droidbittin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210916.n.0 changes
To: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases <test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


g-i-s is still broken in the Workstation iso for Rawhide today btw just fyi, crashing after install in a Virtualbox VM for me

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 2:20 PM Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 2:14 PM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 1:09 PM Fedora Rawhide Report
<rawhide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ===== ADDED PACKAGES =====
> Package: atkmm2.36-2.36.1-1.fc36
> Summary: C++ interface for the ATK library
> RPMs:    atkmm2.36 atkmm2.36-devel atkmm2.36-doc
> Size:    1.35 MiB

(...)

> Package: glibmm2.68-2.68.1-1.fc36
> Summary: C++ interface for the GLib library
> RPMs:    glibmm2.68 glibmm2.68-devel glibmm2.68-doc
> Size:    12.65 MiB
>
> Package: gtkmm4.0-4.4.0-1.fc36
> Summary: C++ interface for the GTK+ library
> RPMs:    gtkmm4.0 gtkmm4.0-devel gtkmm4.0-doc
> Size:    17.64 MiB
>
> Package: pangomm2.48-2.48.1-1.fc36
> Summary: C++ interface for Pango
> RPMs:    pangomm2.48 pangomm2.48-devel pangomm2.48-doc
> Size:    1.26 MiB

Is there a reason why these compat packages are done "the wrong way round"?
They were requested with exceptions to the review process, but that
exception only applies to requesting versioned compat packages for the
*old* version, not the other way round ...

Sure, there's a good reason! I wanted to keep the same pattern as gtk has, so that there's gtk3 and matching gtkmm3.0, and gtk4 and matching gtkmm4.0.

They are all long-lived parallel installable packages and most stuff is going to be using the "old" gtkmm3.0 still for a number of years to come.

Doing it this way also makes it much easier to add the new packages to F34 where I don't want to be undertaking large package renaming.

-- 
Kalev 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
_______________________________________________
desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux