Hi Chris, This is interesting, can you send them to devel@ too given that the feature is wider than just Workstation. Peter On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 11:30 PM Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Idea floated on #fedora-workstation is to have a weekly status report > by email. The idea is to make sure that everyone is kept in the loop, > while at the same time making sure Btrfs isn't bumping other > priorities off the meeting agenda. > > - What has and hasn't happened since the last update: what has made > progress, what might be stalled. > - Any particularly nasty bug reports > - Urgent priority questions/concerns about these reports should be > brought up in the "Follow-ups & Status reports" portion of weekly WG > meetings > - Any normal questions/concerns/requests for more details should be > brought up in Open Floor, or respond to the report email > > ------- > > (This first update is big. Subsequent updates should be smaller.) > > Changes: > > + Anaconda defaults to Btrfs for automatic partitioning for all > desktop installation media > > + libvirtd patches have landed that will set 'nodatacow' (chattr +C) > on VM image containing directories when on Btrfs, by default: > virt-manager, GNOME Boxes, Cockpit, et al, will benefit from this > directly; minimally tested OK, needs some further testing > > + Numerous btrfs kernel patches, related to Fedora concerns and > requests have landed on upstream linux-btrfs@, including new > 'rescue=all' mount option to better tolerate read-only mount despite > file system damage > > + anaconda fix for Silverblue on Btrfs, set "rootflags" boot parameter > so startup succeeds > > + various compose related fixes for non-ISO images; PR submitted, not > yet merged into production (consequence is, these Rawhide images are > not being created right now for armhfp: Workstation, KDE, Xfce, LXDE, > MATE, Sugar) > > + btrfs driver is now built-in to the kernel, rather than as a module > > + Red Hat CKI (Continuous Kernel Integration) have added btrfs to > their regular xfstests and will report failures upstream > > Communication: > > + Fedora Magazine article(s) are in the idea and specification phase. > https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/162 > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/btrfs-by-default/22020 > https://teams.fedoraproject.org/project/asamalik-fedora-magazine/us/216?kanban-status=280 > > Documentation: > > + Draft material available for review, organization and content > development in-progress. > https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/158 > > + Clarification on what degree effort should be spent on updating > upstream wiki so it doesn't conflict with Fedora reality; versus > Fedora specific content focus. > > Noteworthy bugs: > > + Btrfs corruption tracked down to bad RAM (confirmed with > memtest86+); will result in improvements to 'btrfs check --repair' to > better handle this case; does also expose the difficulty with Btrfs > only stating the facts rather than pointing the finger at the cause. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857996 > > + Btrfs tracking bug > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851166 > > > > -- > Chris Murphy > _______________________________________________ > desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx