On Wed, 2019-03-27 at 08:50 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 6:37 AM Damian Ivanov < > damianatorrpm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thank you for the response Kevin. > > > > Is there a wiki with other build options specific to fedora (like > > previously disabled freetype etc) impacting user experience and/or > > their alternatives availability at rpmfusion? > > > > Would be nice to have that in the wiki. > > > > Fedora can't put that sort of content in its own wiki because of > legal > reasons. (Google "contributory infringement"). RPMFusion exists > because Fedora is bound by US copyright and patent law and cannot > ship > certain items. Documenting how to get them somewhere else is > equivalent (from a legal perspective) to providing it. So how does Canonical do exactly that with the universe component repo and the various supported and unsupported PPA repos, and why can't Fedora do it the same way? It seems like the Fedora interpretation of U.S. law is quite different than Ubuntu's for unclear reasons. _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
