> 3. Still the old criticism: Flatpak applications have gigantic > overhead. Will you be providing several hundreds of megabytes of > updates for each and every update in each and every dependency? If > you do, you'll loose users with slower than fibre-connected internet > will not get updates. If you don't, people will have unpatched > security bugs in totem. Also, debugging flatpak applications is quite > hard, same for automated crash reporting. Flatpak uses OSTree which has a very efficient deduplication and deltas, so this is not really a problem. I'm a user with "slower than fibre-connected internet" (6 Mbps at home) and believe me that flatpaks are not really a problem, much more is consumed by GNOME Software downloading RPMs for updates and not using delta RPMs. Moreover flatpaks can be safely automatically updated on the background, so the user won't even know about it. Jiri _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
