----- Original Message ----- > Yes, I know it. And I only wanted to express my opinion, which I did. And I > believe that the thread appeared here, because Bastien wanted to hear our > opinions. Otherwise he would not have asked. > > The reasoning for my opinion is this: When people install Fedora Workstation, > they want to use it right away. How would a newbie know, that there is > Flatpak? How does the user know that there is a third-party RPM repository that contains the necessary codecs for the movie player to work? > How does it go together with Fedora policy? We cannot ship codecs > in packages, and we can ship codecs in Flatpaks? And if not, what is the > difference then? It's a Flatpak and it's from a third-party repository. Flatpaks from Fedora couldn't ship those, RPMs from a third-party repository likely could. > If Flatpak Videos is better than an RPM Videos, why not install that from > Flatpaks in the default install then? Because we cannot ship, or point to, potentially patent-infringing software in Fedora. _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
